Why is AI-generated content often considered unwatchable?

I completely relate to the frustration with AI content. The first issue is the AI voice itself—it often comes across as robotic and monotonous. I recently clicked on a video about the USS Thresher disaster, and within 30 seconds, I was out. The voice was so dull, it made a 40-minute video feel unbearable. It's hard to stay engaged when the delivery lacks any kind of emotional nuance.

One of the biggest turn-offs for me is how easily identifiable AI content is. The uniformity in voice and delivery makes it feel like low-rent material. When I hear that same robotic tone, I can't help but click away. It feels lazy and unoriginal, like the creators are just chasing ad revenue instead of trying to offer something unique or valuable to their audience.

Some people argue that they prefer AI-generated content because it is free from the awkwardness of human presenters. However, I find that even the best AI voices can't replace the authenticity and charisma of a real person speaking. I've experimented with AI scripts in the past, and they tend to lack depth and a point, which ultimately makes them unengaging.

I think the over-reliance on AI stems from the misconception that it leads to quick success on platforms like YouTube. Many creators are using basic information just to maximize views. However, audiences have evolved—they crave unique, high-quality content. Unfortunately, AI content often fails to meet these standards, leaving viewers feeling underwhelmed.

I remember watching office training videos from the 80s and 90s, and AI content gives me those same vibes—dull and uninspired. My own content has shifted back to featuring me as the narrator because I realized that my personality and presence add a layer of engagement that AI simply cannot replicate. It’s all about making that personal connection with viewers.