Is VidIQ Worth It for YouTube SEO?

I agree that VidIQ can sometimes cater more to content farms rather than genuine creators. It encourages a formulaic approach to video creation that can strip away originality. I believe that creating unique and authentic content should take precedence over chasing SEO scores provided by tools like VidIQ.

Thumbnails are crucial, and based on feedback I've received, AI-generated images can be off-putting. If you decide to use VidIQ or similar tools, make sure to prioritize creating eye-catching thumbnails and effective titles without cluttering them with unnecessary text or hashtags.

In my experience, VidIQ was a disappointing investment. I found that the features it offered didn't translate into any real benefits for my channel. Instead of focusing on SEO scores, which can be quite misleading, I realized that understanding SEO principles myself would be far more beneficial.

I think there's a trend where SEO tools are becoming less relevant on platforms like YouTube. Instead of relying on these tools, I’ve found that focusing on content quality, viewer engagement, and consistent posting has led to better results than tweaking every little SEO variable.

Honestly, I think tools like VidIQ and TubeBuddy are overrated. They often give you a false sense of security by providing high SEO scores that don't necessarily correlate with success. I’ve seen channels with low scores outperform those with high ones simply by creating engaging content. So, investing time in learning SEO through free resources might be a better approach.